Hyeon Chung vs Tennys Sandgren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
H. Chung vs T. Sandgren

Hyeon Chung

KOR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

379

C. Rank

740

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.5M

Career Money

$2.3M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Tennys Sandgren

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

379

C. Rank

740

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.5M

Career Money

$2.3M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Chung 2 - 0 Sandgren

They have played 6 sets in total, with Hyeon Chung winning 5 and Tennys Sandgren winning 1. The last match between Hyeon Chung and Tennys Sandgren was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 24-01-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Chung	2
Sandgren	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(QF) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-24-18)

Stats

Hyeon Chung

Tennys Sandgren

(R1) ASB Classic - Auckland(01-09-18)

Stats

Hyeon Chung

Tennys Sandgren

H. Chung vs T. Sandgren H2H Profile

H. Chung	Stats	T. Sandgren
$2,529,406	Career Prize Money	$2,256,263
64.43% (288-159)	Career Total W/L	56.43% (421-325)
2	Hard	0
17	Titles	16
2	Total H2H Matches	0
50.00% (1-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

H. Chung vs T. Sandgren Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hyeon Chung has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Tennys Sandgren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hyeon Chung, in recent form, has won 46.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tennys Sandgren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.58% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Hyeon Chung has saved 50.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tennys Sandgren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Hyeon Chung has won 61.67% of matches played (W/L 37/23), with Tennys Sandgren winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Hyeon Chung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 233/113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/8). Tennys Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 241/175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/10).
Player level: In the last year, Hyeon Chung has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 79.31% of matches (W/L 23/6), where as Tennys Sandgren has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hyeon Chung winning 2 times and Tennys Sandgren being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Hyeon Chung winning 5 and Tennys Sandgren winning 1.
The last match between Hyeon Chung and Tennys Sandgren was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 24-01-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:53.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hyeon Chung has played against opponents with an average rank of 427.55 while Tennys Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hyeon Chung has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tennys Sandgren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Hyeon Chung has converted 35.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tennys Sandgren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Hyeon Chung vs Tennys Sandgren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. Chung vs T. Sandgren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

H. Chung	Stats	T. Sandgren
2	H2H Matches Won	0
5	Sets Won	1
36	Games Won	26
9	Aces (Total)	19
6	Total Double Faults	5
2:19:53	Average Match Time	2:19:53
72% (146/203)	1st Serve %	55% (109/199)
71% (103/146)	1st Serve Win %	70% (76/109)
53% (30/57)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (39/90)
36% (9/25)	Break Pts Won %	25% (5/20)
40% (79/199)	Return Points Win %	33% (67/203)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

H. Chung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R2 Chun Hsin TsengC. Hsin	L	1-6 6-2 7-5	Stats
R1 Ryuki MatsudaR. Matsuda	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
Matsuyama Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Philip SekulicP. Sekulic	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
R1 Chak Lam Coleman WongC. Lam	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Fajing SunF. Sun	L	6-3 7-6(5)	Stats

View All

T. Sandgren Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Savannah Challenger - 22-04-2024
R2 Tristan BoyerT. Boyer	L	1-6 6-0 6-1	Stats
R1 Thai KwiatkowskiT. Kwiatkowski	W	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Tallahassee Challenger - 15-04-2024
R2 Stefan KozlovS. Kozlov	L	6-2 6-7(5) 6-1	Stats
R1 Martin DammM. Damm	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
Sarasota Challenger - 08-04-2024
SF Zizou BergsZ. Bergs	L	6-2 3-6 6-4	Stats

View All

H. Chung vs T. Sandgren Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

H. Chung	Stats	T. Sandgren
64.43% (288/159)	YTD Win/Loss	56.43% (421/325)
61.66% (661/411)	Sets Win/Loss	55.82% (993/786)
54.78% (5366/4429)	Games Win/Loss	52.11% (8948/8222)
67.34% (233/113)	Hard Win/Loss	57.93% (241/175)
58.82% (30/21)	Clay Win/Loss	52.84% (93/83)
57.50% (23/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (76/57)
20.00% (2/8)	Grass Win/Loss	52.38% (11/10)
0.26	Aces Per Game	0.48
1234	Aces Total	4008
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.16
1153	Total Double Faults	1355
1:25:5	Average Match Time	1:18:11
538.51	Average Opponent Rank	532.61
62% (15992/25708)	1st Serve %	61% (25668/42295)
70% (11205/15992)	1st Serve Win %	73% (18700/25668)
51% (4908/9716)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (8246/16625)
45% (1299/2910)	Break Points Won % (Total)	38% (1428/3756)
42% (11134/26805)	Return Points Win %	37% (15591/42108)
57.89% (22/16)	Slam W/L	43.86% (25/32)
51.52% (17/16)	Masters W/L	36.36% (12/21)
78.57% (11/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
55.66% (59/47)	Main Tour W/L	40.86% (38/55)
65.63% (105/55)	Challenger W/L	55.87% (195/154)
77.08% (74/22)	Futures W/L	70.89% (151/62)
64% (257/401)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (402/706)
68% (28/41)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	46% (17/37)
51% (68/133)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (161/309)
56% (69/123)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (110/236)
87% (287/249)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (434/360)
13% (287/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (434/74)
24% (160/39)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (312/62)