Prediction of Hyeon Chung [478th] vs Tennys Sandgren [740th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W W W L W L W LH2H: Chung 2 - 0 Sandgren
They have played 6 sets in total, with Chung winning 5 and Sandgren winning 1. The last match between Chung and Sandgren was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 24-01-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | 2 |
| Tennys Sandgren | 0 |
| Chung | Stats | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| 86% (18-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 478 | Ranking | 740 |
| 19 | Highest Rank | 41 |
| 28 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 17 | Titles | 16 |
| 66% (274-141) | Career Total W/L | 56% (421-325) |
| $2,529,406 | Career Prize Money | $2,256,263 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Hyeon Chung
Player
Tennys Sandgren
76%
(
81 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
7
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
34 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
115
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-3 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Tennys Sandgren
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 36 | Games Won | 26 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:19:53 | Average Match Time | 2:19:53 |
| 72% (146/203) | 1st Serve % | 55% (109/199) |
| 71% (103/146) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (76/109) |
| 53% (30/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (39/90) |
| 36% (9/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (5/20) |
| 40% (79/199) | Return Points Win % | 33% (67/203) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hyeon Chung vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chung 2 - 0 Sandgren
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chung has won 39.92% of points on their second serve, while Sandgren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chung, in recent form, has won 45.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chung has saved 45.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chung has won 74.29% of matches played (W/L 26/ 9), with Sandgren winning 33.33% (W/L 1/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 220/ 96), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Chung has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.42% of matches (W/L 24/ 7), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chung winning 2 times and Sandgren being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Chung winning 5 and Sandgren winning 1. The last match between Chung and Sandgren was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 24-01-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hyeon Chung getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chung and Sandgren have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chung winning 1 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chung winning 1, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chung has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.63 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 400.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chung has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chung has converted 33.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Colin Sinclair
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yusuke Kusuhara
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Naoki Tajima
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Moerani Bouzige
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Tai Sach
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Chung vs Sandgren?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Chung Vs Sandgren is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (274/141) | Win/Loss | 56% (421/325) |
| 63% (626/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (993/786) |
| 55% (5028/4099) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8948/8222) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1180 | Aces Total | 4008 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 992 | Total Double Faults | 1355 |
| 1:23:40 | Average Match Time | 1:18:11 |
| 161.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 162.27 |
| 63% (14810/23665) | 1st Serve % | 61% (25668/42295) |
| 71% (10448/14810) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (18700/25668) |
| 51% (4496/8855) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8246/16625) |
| 45% (1188/2648) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1428/3756) |
| 41% (10193/24651) | Return Points Win % | 37% (15591/42108) |
| 66% (243/369) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (402/706) |
| 68% (28/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 53% (66/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (161/309) |
| 59% (67/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (110/236) |
| 87% (271/237) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (434/360) |
| 13% (271/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (434/74) |
| 26% (144/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (312/62) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hyeon Chung
View full predicted draw for Chung
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
